Hello!
Does anyone knows where I can find the date of creation of a transport request? For released and modifiable tr.
The action log is not active here and the E070CREATE table is not the solution for released tr.
Best Regards.
↧
Date of creation of a released transport request
↧
Heisenbug in enhancement
Hi ABAPers,
I have an enhancement implementation that looks up a value from a db table and adds it into an appended structure which is then displayed in an ALV.
When it is executed the values are not displayed in the grid - the column remains empty. If I set a break point in the enhancement and run it, the column displays the value.
Even stranger is that other people in the same system have run this code and get no results, but after I've stepped through with a debugger, the value that I've stepped through is not only displayed for me, but for anyone else who uses the same dataset. Use new data and it doesn't display the value, step through it one in the debugger and it displays for everyone afterwards. As if by stepping through it in a debugger somehow changes the properties of that single piece of data to be visible for everyone.
What I've done:
Verified that the db table contains the values to be transported before running without debugging and then with debugging.
Verified that the table has no buffering.
Had two people side by side run the same data set with the same results - nothing in the column.
Stepped through in the degbugger.
Had the two people run the same workflow again with the same data set, identical results - data is displayed in the column.
Normally with a Heisenbug I'd be looking for initialisation errors, compiler optimisations, caching mechanisms, threading or concurrency, dirty reads/writes, etc.
As I'm pretty new to ABAP, any suggestions of where to look for the underlying issue would be greatly appreciated.
N.B. the enhancement point is in proprietary code, not produced by SAP, but by the company I work for.
↧
↧
Implicit Enhancement on activation dumps
Hi,
I am adding an Implicit Enhancement. On activation includes dumps, it allows to save but doesnt activate.
Message type 'X'- function module AC_FLUSH_CALL is called. Error raised is Method Call error .Reports ENH_BADI_GENERATION_ALL/ENH_REGENERATE/ENH_REPAIR_ENHLOADINVAL doesnt help .
Thanks
Mohinder
↧
Total Delivery cost for partial Item delivery
Hi Guru,
I have a requirement wherein I have to apply the total delivery cost for partial Item delivery.
For example: Even if there is partial GR, Delivery cost must be paid in full.
Say PO is for 100 PC and delivery cost is 100 EUR. Now at MIGO if the delivered quantity is 60, the freight vendor must still be paid 100 EUR.
and second time if we do GR for rest 40, then also system should take 100 EUR as Delivery Cost.
Is this possible by configuration or do we need to make any changes at code level? If yes, Please guide me on how to do that....
↧
Add New Field in KO01,KO02,Ko03
Hi all ,
I need to add new 2 description fields under standard one 2 red lines as in below image .
please advise .
thanks.
↧
↧
BADI for Customer Master PC enhancement
Hi experts!
I am required to enhance Customer Master for the following requirement:
1. Whenever a PC changes ownership, create a mirror copy of the PC and increment the last digit of the Customer every time there is a change. First customer will be blocked for sales activities which is a manual activity. The new PC number will be linked to the new owner.
e.g.if PC 300300-000 moves from owner#1 to owner#2, then a new PC gets created as 300300-001 and this will be linked to
owner#2. So PC 300300-001 with new bank information will be assigned to new owner#2 and PC 300300-000 will be blocked.
2. This enhancement will trigger whenever a new customer (KUNNR) is created with account group (KTOKD) Z001 and if there is a value existing in reference customer number (RF02D-REF_KUNNR) whose account group is also Z001, Call BADI CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA, to validate that the new customer number is one number incremented to the referred customer number. If the validation fails, system should throw an error messge.
Would appreciate any help that i can get. I am new to enhancements and BADIs in particular.
Thanks in advance.
Padma
↧
Adobe Form
Hellow Gurus,
what is the prerequisites for using adobe form in sap ecc6
Reagards
sujit nayak
↧
exits for LT03 stock overview screen
Hi Team,
There is a requirement to add new coloumn to the exsisting layout of LT03 stock overview screen.After adding i need to populate Parent SU details in the new coloumn.I have searched for the exits but not able to find.Can you please help me on this one..
Thanks and Regards,
Shakeer
↧
Spare Parts Reservation in SAP DBM
Hi all,
Greetings..!
In SAP DBM, if i create the spare parts reservation for service order, i am not able to see who has created the reservation in MB24.
The column(User Name) is always empty.But if i create the normal reservation through Tcode MB21, the User name is getting appeared
Any idea to resolve this?
Regards,
Rangakarthick
↧
↧
We have a requirement where we have to add new field in location tab of transaction IE01.
We have a requirement where we have to add new field in location tab of transaction IE01.
I tried to search for screen exit and BADI but all are relataed to create additional tab but our requirement is to create new field "time access" that will have dropdown, in location tab.
↧
CO02-desabling Menu item
Hello SAP Gurus,
In CO02 ( Production Order Change ) I want to hide or
disable the sequence overview button and component overview button.
Is there any way of hiding/ disabling it from some users?.
I can not use Variant using SHD0 , as it leads to operational problem during the Drill-Down working .
Thanks in Advance.
Rgds
Mallikarjun.
↧
User Exit to lock if 2 users are trying to update the same table through different transactions
Hi All,
Right now the issue is, if one particular user is raising one invoice and in the same time if another user is doing some payment for the same customer.
Due to this transaction, there will be change in the Credit master data (FD32- KNKK table SKFOR field. Since all the user is trying to amend this field through different user transactions, the table is not updating properly.
So we would like to go for a user exit in such way that- if the user is trying to amend the KNKK-SKFOR table through different transaction then we should allow only one user.
Please any one share any user exit through which i can fit in this requirement.
Regards,
Mythily.A
↧
FV60 / MIRO: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 implemented but not called
All,
I implemented badi BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 but it is not called.
I only added a breakpoint in the code and used the code from the example implementation from SAP.
When I debug transaction FV60 and MIRO on CL_EXITHANDLER=>get_instance, badi BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 is never called.
Is there some customizing I have to do so the badi is called? Or is there something else?
Regards,
Robert
↧
↧
Need to enhance the screen of sepa mandate(fsepa_m3)
Hi Experts,
We have a requirement of adding new field on the screen of Sepa mandate maintainance( Tcode FSEPA_M3 , (Give a mandate ref id and hit enter)) . We have tried but there are no screen exits BADIs provided by SAP. Is It possible to do it using BDT customizing or any other way ? IF possible using BDT kindly provide the details of transaction for publishing the application and the path in SPRO for configuring the same.
Regards
Priyank
↧
Heisenbug in enhancement
Hi ABAPers,
I have an enhancement implementation that looks up a value from a db table and adds it into an appended structure which is then displayed in an ALV.
When it is executed the values are not displayed in the grid - the column remains empty. If I set a break point in the enhancement and run it, the column displays the value.
Even stranger is that other people in the same system have run this code and get no results, but after I've stepped through with a debugger, the value that I've stepped through is not only displayed for me, but for anyone else who uses the same dataset. Use new data and it doesn't display the value, step through it one in the debugger and it displays for everyone afterwards. As if by stepping through it in a debugger somehow changes the properties of that single piece of data to be visible for everyone.
What I've done:
Verified that the db table contains the values to be transported before running without debugging and then with debugging.
Verified that the table has no buffering.
Had two people side by side run the same data set with the same results - nothing in the column.
Stepped through in the degbugger.
Had the two people run the same workflow again with the same data set, identical results - data is displayed in the column.
Normally with a Heisenbug I'd be looking for initialisation errors, compiler optimisations, caching mechanisms, threading or concurrency, dirty reads/writes, etc.
As I'm pretty new to ABAP, any suggestions of where to look for the underlying issue would be greatly appreciated.
N.B. the enhancement point is in proprietary code, not produced by SAP, but by the company I work for.
↧
SAP note validity
Hi experts,
I've read that SAP notes are changes to standard code which are to be included in the next release. I was approached by a team to implement a SAP note; upon checking the validity the note is only applicable to previous SAP versions. Our system is a more recent one. When I check the SAP note in SNOTE, it says "can be implemented". My question is, is this note applicable? Should I follow the validity section of the SAP note? Or can I implement this because it's status says so in SNOTE?
Thanks in advance.
↧
Need to backup MIGO
Hi all,
I need to back up the transaction MIGO in a ZMIGO, with all the includes and enhancements in order to apply the note 1523750.
Theres anything to be carefull about? Or any advice? Any of you already do that?
Thanks for any comment.
JC 
↧
↧
Exit to create long text of notification by IW31
Hi
We have requirement , where we have to pass some fixed text to notification's long text when notification is being created by TCS service order(Tcode- iw31).
Is there any exit/bapi/ fm to achieve same?
↧
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and ME_ACCOUNTING_CHECK problem
Hi,
I'm using the badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to set kostl if the knttp is 'K'. Before the badi runs, in the me21n runs ME_ACCOUNTING_CHECK that check if the kostl field is obligatory, and give an error if its empty. I've got the error before my badi fills the field. How can I skip this check?
This is how i fill the field in the process item method.
SELECT SINGLE saknr kostl INTO (wa_mepoacc-sakto, wa_mepoacc-kostl) FROM zmmt00005 "kostl (ls_item-kostl,
WHERE ambit EQ vl_ambit
AND lgort EQ ls_item-lgort
AND matkl EQ ls_item-matkl.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
lw_account-accounting->set_data( wa_mepoacc ).
cl_po ?= clv_header.
IF NOT cl_po->my_recheck_queue IS INITIAL.
CLEAR cl_po->my_recheck_queue.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Thanks
Sorry for my bad english
↧
ABAP: SD user-exits - custom fields using from KNVV or VBAK
Hi all,
I have a technical question.
I've created some custom fields in table KNVV. The values of these custom fields have to be used during Sales Order creation/modification for determining materials or princing, in sales order user-exits.
My question is:
During the Sales Order creation/modification, in the userexits:
Is it preferable to get directly the values of the custom fields from KNVV?
OR
Is it preferable to transfer values of the custom fields from KNVV to VBAK (which was extended with the same custom fields like KNVV...) with transfer data, and then use only VBAK?
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Have a nice day!
↧